analysis context and strategy

Current Political Context for JVP’s Work

Howie Machtinger’s 1/16/2022
JVP-Triangle Member Meeting Presentation

I am not going to provide a lot of answers today, but I think I will pose some of the right questions for us to consider as JVP and as individuals. Let’s think about the current political context for our work and how we might effectively respond.

  1. The rise of global and domestic fascist/anti-democratic, authoritarian—whatever you want to call it–movements. In October, 1917, “white nationalist leader Richard Spencer gave Israel as an example of an ‘ethno-state’ he aspires to create in the United States.”

    In a July, 2018 tweet, he elaborated, “I have great admiration for Israel’s nation-state law. Jews are, once again, at the vanguard, rethinking politics and sovereignty for the future, showing a path forward for Europeans,” Spencer is playing the role of the quintessential anti-Semitic Zionist. Israel has cultivated relations with right-wing leaders like Modi in India, Orban in Hungary, Duterte in the Philippines, and Bolsonaro in Brazil as part of a global network of right-wing regimes. Fascists require a “dangerous” other –for Netanyahu and Bennett, that other is the Palestinians. Bennett proudly proclaims himself as to the right of Netanyahu and doesn’t even pay lip service to the so-called two-state solution. Bennet, lacking Netanyahu’s flamboyance and obvious corruption— with the US’s connivance—have managed to keep Israel and Palestine largely absent from the media and political conversation, except for some initial praise for Israel’s Covid response, of course, without reference to Palestinians. Even the outrageous classification of six eminent and world respected Palestinian human rights and civil society organizations as terrorist groups or the evictions in Sheikh Jarrah have received little international response. How can we act to turn this around—clarify Israel’s actual role in the world—not as a Middle East democracy, but as a focal point of the world right-wing surge?
  1. Charlottesville and the October, 2018 murders in the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh made publicly evident the role of anti-Semitism in the US’s right-wing movement. Jews are considered as key to “Replacement” theory. We are seen as the insidious, manipulative force behind immigration as well as Black protest. And of course, Christian nationalism’s key tenet is that the US is a white Christian nation to be purged of interlopers. We have not been the central targets of the right, but still we are not considered legitimate Americans.

    I should note: As last week (January, 2022) made obvious, not all anti-Semitism, of course, emanates from the organized Right. Anti-Semitism has traction amongst various tendencies and groupings, even among some anti-Zionist fellow travelers. Too much of Zionist practice has functioned as a fertile field for anti-Semitic currents.

    We are also faced with a double whammy; simultaneously the target of right-wing anti-Semitism, and accused of anti-Semitism by some of the same forces because of our anti-Zionism. Our event on anti-Semitism in 2019 was a good effort to undermine these two-faced accusations. How might we follow up?

    January 6 has not slowed down this right-wing movement, but rather sped it up. The response of establishment politics has so far been weak and not very effective. We are obviously in a dangerous moment.
  1. We are further confronted with important elections in 2022 and 2024 with the Republican Party taken over by the hard right and the polls trending in their direction. The Biden Administration serves as a handmaiden to Israel policy–except with respect to Iran. While public opinion has moved positively on Palestine, the Palestinian solidarity movement has not succeeded in turning this change in public opinion into substantive change in political policy. How can we do better?
  2. Besides all this, there is growing militarism, with hot spots with respect to Iran—with Israel firmly opposed to any nuclear deal–Russia/Ukraine, and most of all China. The defense budget is up. There is also the ongoing climate crisis lacking effective political leadership in response. The same right-wingers are big supporters of a military buildup (along with many Democrats) and climate deniers.

This is obviously all quite bracing, overwhelming. Unfortunately, it is also real. The questions for us: are: how does our work connect to any or all of this? What work and organization is required? Who might be our allies? What new formations or coalitions would be helpful? What other work might we/should we connect to? I am not making an argument to pull back on Palestinian solidarity work, but rather thinking about how to connect our work to other necessary progressive movements and to the anti-fascist movement as a whole. Palestinian solidarity work needs to be a part of a larger movement.

If any of this resonates, what might this mean in practice?


Caravan of Mothers of Disappeared Migrants event with Migrant Roots Media


Shabbat Shuva Dvar

Please consider reading this Shabbat Shuva offering from Carol Prince and Beth Bruch of JVP Triangle.


Solidarity Shabbat for Palestine

Sign the Pledge: A Call for Jews to Endorse Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions


Facebook, we need to talk

Please learn more and sign the petition at


JVP Triangle NC demands the resignation of seven members of North Carolina’s congressional delegation who voted to object to the election certification

JVP Triangle NC demands the resignation of seven members of North Carolina’s congressional delegation who voted to object to the election certification. We join a growing chorus of constituents and organizers across the state to make clear that Dan Bishop (NC-09), Madison Cawthorn (NC-11), Virginia Foxx (NC-05), Ted Budd (NC-13), Richard Hudson (NC-08), Gregory Murphy (NC-03), and David Rouzer (NC-07) aligned themselves with and energized a white supremacist, authoritarian insurrection on January 6th. These seven members have forfeited their right to represent the people of North Carolina.

As anti-fascist Jews and allies, we are particularly concerned about two members of North Carolina’s delegation who openly associate with right-wing, antisemitic causes while embracing Christian zionism. Dan Bishop (R-09) invested in Gab, a social media platform popular among neo-nazis, including Robert Bowers, the man who murdered 11 people at a Pittsburgh synagogue. Madison Cawthorn (R-11) has openly admitted to trying to convert Jews to Christianity and has espoused antisemitic conspiracy theories. Both of these men have voiced strong support for the state of Israel. To us, this is neither surprising nor a contradiction. Christian zionists often voice support for Israel while espousing antisemitic conspiracy theories–in fact, some waved Israeli flags at Wednesday’s insurrection. The U.S. Jewish establishment can no longer ignore the fact that pro-Trump white nationalists support Israel on the basis that it is an apartheid state.

On Wednesday we witnessed white Jews, including Aaron Mostofsky, the son of a Brooklyn judge, marching with insurrectionists carrying the Nazi flag.The day provided a clear example of the growing trend of white Jews who are emboldened by Trump to embrace white supremacist violence. This trend occurs within the historic context of anti-Blackness in predominantly white Jewish spaces. We call on white Jewish people to align with Jewish people of color and others targeted by white supremacy, not with white supremacy and fascism.

There is no denying that the white nationalist movement is organized and prepared for another violent coup attempt during the Inauguration. We are committed to deepening our solidarity with all those who oppose fascism in the U.S. and abroad, and know that the time for organizing to oppose fascism is now.


Op-Ed: Triangle Jewish Voice for Peace Responds to Pompeo’s Visit and Anti-Semitism

In case you missed it, op-ed by Carol Prince, Sandra Korn, & Emerson Goldstein published in the Indy on November 25, 2020:


Happy Hanukkah

We’re doing stuff every night at 6:00 pm Eastern. Reach out or check your email for a zoom link. Here is a link to the zine we put together.

JVP Triangle Hanukkah 5781 with stylized image of menorah

Consider donating to projects like Mutual Aid for Palestinians’ “Oxygen for Gaza” appeal in conjunction with the Jewish Voice for Peace Health Advisory Council for CPAP respirators and other support for Gaza.

Here are links to the dreidel games I (Beth) programmed. (They need to be played on a computer.):

Screeshot from the online dreidel game. A room with a Hanukkiah in a window, 4 dreidels displaying the Hebrew letters נ, ג, ה & ש. There is also a green dreidel separately that may be virtually spun during the game and several groups of coins with names and point values. There is a blue box declaring which player's turn is next.

Wishing a sweet new year to all.

Check out our 5781 New Year’s greeting with links to music and poetry.



Link to PDF Demilitarize Statement 4-16-18[4958]


April 16, 2018

On April 5, 2018, Mayor Steve Schewel introduced a statement to Durham City Council regarding police exchanges with Israeli police or military forces.i The statement “affirms as policy that the Durham Police Department will not engage in such exchanges” and that the Council “opposes international exchanges with any country in which Durham officers receive military-style training.” Furthermore, the statement recognizes the need for demilitarization of police in our city. During this meeting each Council member voiced their support for this statement and the accompanying policy barring any future police exchanges with Israel or other foreign countries. The Demilitarize from Durham 2 Palestine Coalition supports Durham City Council’s adoption of this policy.

The need for this new policy was prompted by a number of factors: the mistreatment of Palestinians and Black Israelis by Israeli forces; the mistreatment of people of color in the United States by police forces here; and the widespread participation in these exchanges by police departments around the country, including in Durham.

Police departments across the United States have taken the opportunity to receive “intensive counter-terrorism training” by “experts” from the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), Israeli intelligence and security services, and Israeli Police. For instance, Durham was listed last September as a participant in a one-week “National Counter-Terrorism Seminar” held by the AntiDefamation League (ADL).ii Trainings in Israel are advertised proudly on the résumés of both the formeriii and currentiv Chiefs of Police. The clear purpose of these trainings, as evidenced by descriptions in materials from the ADL and other organizations facilitating such exchanges, is the study of “counter-terrorism tactics.”v,vi,vii Despite recent assurances that Chief Davis’ specific visits “had nothing to do with terrorism tactics,”viii her previous department in Atlanta has boasted that their program was one in which “officers learn tactics on preventing acts of terror.”ix

We must ask, then, what “tactics” Israeli forces employ in order to “prevent terror.” Human Rights Watch has noted that the outcome of policing by Israel in occupied Palestinian territories has not been to improve the well-being of, or to promote the public safety of, the policed community, but to maintain a racially segregated society in which one group is made inferior via the denial of rights and dignity.x Groups including the United Nations, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, Israel’s B’Tselem, and former Israeli soldiers providing testimony have cited the Israeli police and military forces for a long list of abusive tactics. One tactic is over-surveillance of the public, often based on racial profiling and regardless of innocence.xi Another tactic is the disproportionate response to non-violent or non-threatening protests.xii Yet another is the use of arbitrary and sustained detentions without due process.xiii,xiv There is, of course, the violence and other ill-treatment used against both African Israelis and Palestinians, including children, detained inside Israel and in the occupied Palestinian territories.xv,xvi And finally, there is the de-facto shoot-to-kill policy when dealing with Palestinians suspected of terrorism, regardless of whether or not they pose an immediate threat.xvii,xviii

This is not to say that policing in America has somehow been less abusive than in Israel. On the contrary, the legacy of violent and racist policing meant to benefit the well-off stretches back much further in our country. This legacy is both historic and ongoing. We do not wish for anyone in America to suffer at the hands of Israeli-style policing— just as we do not wish for the Palestinians or anyone in Israel to become victim to the “tactics” provided by U.S. police. American police departments that have participated in Israeli police and military trainings share the negative qualities seen in Israeli policing. The infamous “Demographics Unit” of the New York Police Departmentxix mirrored the discriminatory over-surveillance of Muslimsxx seen in Israel. The tactics used by the St. Louis city and county police forcesxxi in Ferguson, MO, prompted Palestinians to offer advice on minimizing the harmful effects of tear gas to protesters there.xxii The variety of abusesxxiii seen from the Baltimore Police Departmentxxiv have made them synonymous, in the Israeli press,xxv with police brutality. And under former Chief Lopez the Durham Police Department, like police in Israel, used tear gas as a method of controlling local protesters.xxvi Despite recent overall declines in traffic stops due in part to recommendations made by Durham FADE (Fostering Alternative Drug Enforcement), 2016 data nonetheless revealed that once a motorist was stopped by the Durham police, searches were more likely to occur in vehicles with Black or Hispanic drivers. In fact, Blacks were victim to over 80% of traffic searches yielding no contraband while comprising only 40% of the population.xxvii The Council confirmed in last week’s statement that “black motorists are still more likely to be stopped than white motorists.”

The City Council’s new policy addresses two connected injustices: the militarization of police in Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and the militarization of police in the United States. Our coalition’s support is founded on the recognition that those injustices are linked—both methodically, in their tactics, and materially, in the monetary support militarizing both states’ forces. The statement sets as a goal “a time when we are beyond policing” and when safety and security are provided in other forms. Members of our coalition intend to hold the Council to this goal. We are here to support an encompassing vision for public safety that abandons violence and militarization. We will promote other markers of wellness, such as providing our people with affordable healthcare, equitable housing, meaningful education, a living wage, and other resources. We will resist unjust sentencing and bail policies and jail conditions. We will oppose the historical and ongoing marginalization of Black, poor, undocumented, Muslim, LGBTQ, and other communities. We will demand equitable and dignified treatment for every resident in our city. And we will demand it for all people, from Durham to Palestine.

ii (Anti-Defamation League solicitation for candidates to attend a “National Counter-Terroism Seminar” (NCTS) in Israel held on Sept. 9-17, 2017, and listing the Durham Police Department as one of the police departments whose “[e]xecutives trained in NCTS.”)

iii (“Chief Lopez has also attended the National Counter-Terrorism Training through the Anti-Defamation League in Israel.”)

iv (“Established the APLI International Exchange program coordinating all aspects of Israeli exchange and curriculum for annual Atlanta Police visit, and coordinates annual APD Command delegations to Israel.”)

v (Anti-Defamation League solicitation for candidates to attend a “National Counter-Terroism Seminar” (NCTS) in Israel)

vi (Jewish Institute for National Security of America / JINSA, “The program takes delegations of senior law enforcement executives to Israel to study methods and observe techniques used in preventing and reacting to acts of terrorism and sponsors conferences within the United States, bringing Israeli experts before much larger groups of law enforcement leaders.”

vii (Georgia International Law Enforcement Exchange / GILEE, “GILEE’s focus has been on anti-terrorism training ever since its establishment in 1992.”)

viii (“…my training experience in Israel had nothing to do with terrorism tactics, military tactics, or the use of or exposure to, military equipment.”)

ix (“The APLI program includes training on international law enforcement issues where officers learn tactics on preventing acts of terror, responding to suspicious objects and organizing volunteers for emergency response.”)

x (Massive report by Human Rights Watch documenting the systemantic and comprehensive discrimination against Palestinians and privileging of Jewish settlers and their rights in the Occuppied Territories.)

xi (“As a soldier in Unit 8200, I collected information… All Palestinians are exposed to non-stop monitoring without any legal protection. Junior soldiers can decide when someone is a target for the collection of information. There is no procedure in place to determine whether the violation of the individual’s rights is necessarily justifiable. The notion of rights for Palestinians does not exist at all.”)

xii (Amnesty International 85-page report in 2014 on excessive force in the West Bank, concluding: “Israeli forces have repeatedly violated their obligations under international human rights law by using excessive force to stifle dissent and freedom of expression, resulting in a pattern of unlawful killings and injuries to civilians. They do so with virtual impunity due to the authorities’ failure to conduct thorough investigations.”)

xiii (Report to the UN on the arbitrary detention of Palestinians, particularly children, in Israeli prisons and detention centers without due process, “describing a practice of ‘regular, continuous and comprehensive’ torture, suffered by 90 per cent of prisoners.”)

xiv (May, 2017 – UN Special Rapporteur on the status of human rights in the Palestinian territories, challenged “Israel’s use of administrative detention, which involves imprisonment without charge, trial, conviction or meaningful due process, as well as the possibility of unrestricted renewal of their detention,” noting that “Israel’s use of administrative detention is not in compliance with the extremely limited circumstances in which it is allowed under international humanitarian law, and deprives detainees of basic legal safeguards guaranteed by international human rights law.”)

xv (Amnesty International Report for 2016/17: “Israeli soldiers, police and Israel Security Agency (ISA) officers subjected Palestinian detainees, including children, to torture and other ill-treatment with impunity, particularly on arrest and during interrogation… Complaints that the Israeli police used torture or other ill-treatment against asylum-seekers and members of the Ethiopian community in Israel were also common.”)

xvi (Human Rights Watch Report, April 2016, concluding: “Israeli security forces are abusing Palestinian children detained in the West Bank. The number of Palestinian children arrested by Israeli forces has more than doubled since October 2015. . .. Israeli security forces are using unnecessary force in arresting and detaining children, in some cases beating them, and holding them in unsafe and abusive conditions.”

xvii (B’Tselem and 8 other Israeli human rights organizations sign a statement in 2015 noting: “[T]here has been a worrying trend to use firearms to kill Palestinians who have attacked Israelis or are suspected of such attacks. Several incidents have been documented and reported, raising concern that the chosen response to such persons is the harshest possible, with lethal or – at the very least – unnecessary consequences. In instances when Jews have been suspected of attacks, none of the suspects has been shot. Politicians and senior police officers have not only failed to act to calm the public climate of incitement, but on the contrary have openly called for the extrajudicial killing of suspects. They have also urged civilians to carry weapons.”)

xviii (2017 Human Rights Watch report documenting “numerous statements since October 2015, by senior Israeli politicians, including the police minister and defense minister, calling on police and soldiers to shoot to kill suspected attackers, irrespective of whether lethal force is actually strictly necessary to protect life.” … “Statements by senior Israeli officials, including those at the top of the chain of command, encourage violation of both the international standards regarding the use of force as well as the rules of engagement that Israel issues to its soldiers and police officers. In some cases, officials directly responsible for the conduct of law enforcement officers have publicly encouraged them to kill rather than to arrest suspected attackers when feasible. In other cases, senior political and religious officials who are employed and paid by the government have encouraged the killing of suspected Palestinian attackers, and other senior officials have failed to repudiate those statements.”)

xix (November 16, 2016, WNYC – “Current Commissioner James O’Neill… did report that the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs paid between $5,000 and $48,000 for his trip to Israel with other law enforcement officers from around the country.”)

xx (April 15, 2014, New York Times (NYT) – “The New York Police Department has abandoned a secretive program that dispatched plainclothes detectives into Muslim neighborhoods to eavesdrop on conversations and built detailed files on where people ate, prayed and shopped, the department said.” … “After years of collecting information, however, the police acknowledged that it never generated a lead.”)

xxi (Ebony Article entitled “The Ferguson/Palestine Connection: “The St. Louis County Police Department that killed Michael Brown and initially placed Ferguson on siege has trained with the Israeli military.” … “Over 9,000 American officials have trained with Israeli police and military units on responding to civilian protests and terrorism. These operations reflect failure to distinguish between the apparent duty of police to protect civilians and military responses to war. This fusion has had life-costing implications for Americans, specifically black, Muslim and Arab people.”)

xxii (NYT Aug. 14, 2014: “In addition to echoing the messages of solidarity sent through Twitter to the protesters in [Ferguson] Missouri, Egyptians and Palestinians also offered something more useful: practical advice about how to deal with tear gas.”)

xxiii (The Atlantic, April 22, 2015, “The Brutality of Police Culture in Baltimore,” concluding: “Years of abuses are every bit as egregious as what the Department of Justice documented in Ferguson, Missouri, and as deserving of a national response.”)

xxiv (Amnesty International report August, 2016: “When the U.S. Department of Justice published a report Aug. 10 that documented ‘widespread constitutional violations, discriminatory enforcement, and culture of retaliation’ within the Baltimore Police Department (BPD), there was rightly a general reaction of outrage. But what hasn’t received as much attention is where Baltimore police received training on crowd control, use of force and surveillance: Israel’s national police, military and intelligence services.”)

xxv (full text available at (Haaretz, the longest running Israeli newspaper, May 6, 2015, “Israels Police Force Is Becoming Alarmingly Militarized – and Its No Surprise Why: “The images out of Israel this Sunday looked like they could have been filmed in downtown Baltimore. Young Israelis of Ethiopian descent were being chased down the streets of central Tel Aviv by horse-mounted police officers, dodging stun grenades, fending off tear gas canisters and trying to evade the water cannons headed their way. The center of Tel Aviv, Israels most vibrant, economically powerful city, looked like an urban battlefield. The images, while infuriating, were of course disturbingly familiar. They paralleled in certain ways the riots that took place in Baltimore… In both cases, black men and women, members of a marginalized ethnic minority that has been systematically neglected and discriminated against, have been facing off against an alarmingly militarized police force. In both cases, demonstrations against police brutality were met with more brutality. But while there are indeed similarities between the protests in Tel Aviv and those in Baltimore, the scene was also not-so-vaguely reminisceDemilitarize Statement 4-16-18[4958]nt of another battlefield, one more familiar to Israeli citizens: the West Bank.”

xxvi ( Dec. 19, 2013, Arrests, Tear Gas End Durham Vigil: “Although the assembly was billed as a peaceful event, Durham police massed in riot gear, with tear gas masks on their hips and billy clubs in hand, even before Huerta supporters arrived.”)

xxvii (May 10, 2017 – N&O article on Durham Police Department data from 2010-16 showing persistant disparities between black and white drivers in terms of police traffic stops and searches incident to such stops.)